Grigoris Aivazidis
Lawyer and International Tax Adviser
Cyprus Bar Association Registration No. 7940
Original publication: 20 July 2026
Last substantive legal review: 20 July 2026
Jurisdiction: Republic of Cyprus
Settlement proposals in Cyprus can be made before proceedings, during litigation or through mediation. Their purpose is not merely to suggest a number. A carefully prepared proposal defines what each party must do, which rights end, which rights survive, how payment or performance is secured and what happens if the agreement is breached.
The Cyprus Civil Procedure Rules 2023 distinguish ordinary settlement communications from formal proposals made under Part 35 during court proceedings. A Part 35 proposal follows prescribed requirements and can carry defined consequences relating to costs and interest. An ordinary commercial offer may still be valuable, but it does not automatically receive the procedural effects reserved for a compliant Part 35 proposal.
Settlement is therefore a legal drafting exercise as much as a negotiation. A proposal that appears commercially attractive can create a new dispute if it leaves the release, instalments, authority, confidentiality, tax treatment or enforcement mechanism uncertain.
A proposal can be made by a claimant, defendant or another party with an interest in the dispute. It may address the whole dispute, a defined part of it or one issue such as liability, quantum, costs, share ownership, delivery of property or future conduct. The proposal may involve money, non-monetary performance or both.
Before court proceedings, the parties can negotiate contractually against the background of the applicable pre-action protocol. The 2023 Rules expect reasonable information exchange and appropriate negotiations after the relevant pre-action process. A proposal at this stage should be supported by enough information for the other side to evaluate it.
Once proceedings are underway, Part 35 provides a formal mechanism. It does not prevent parties from making other offers, but a non-Part 35 offer does not receive the specific consequences set out in Part 35. The drafter must decide whether the objective is an ordinary commercial proposal, a protected negotiation, a formal costs-sensitive offer or a combination using separate documents.
A demand letter normally states the open legal position. It identifies the facts, obligation, breach, loss, remedy and deadline. It may later be shown to the court when questions of pre-action conduct or costs arise. It should not be weakened by ambiguous concessions unless there is a strategic reason to include them.
A settlement proposal explores compromise. The proposing party may accept less than the pleaded claim, pay something without admitting liability, agree an exit, vary future obligations or exchange certainty for a release. The negotiation should normally be separated from the open demand or response so the status and intended use of each communication are clear.
The evidence and legal position must still come first. Our guide to pre-litigation strategy in Cyprus explains how to preserve the record, test liability, calculate loss and identify limitation before committing to a proposal.
A settlement amount is only one term of the settlement. A payment promise without a clear deadline, release, security, default clause and enforcement route may simply replace the original dispute with a new one.
Open correspondence records a party’s formal position and can ordinarily be relied upon in proceedings. It is suitable for protocol compliance, factual clarification, document requests, admissions intended to be binding and notices required by contract or law. An open offer can also demonstrate reasonableness, but its legal and costs effect must be assessed carefully.
The phrase “without prejudice” is commonly used for genuine attempts to settle an existing dispute. The label alone is not decisive. A routine factual letter does not become protected merely because the words appear at the top, and exceptions may permit use of settlement communications for limited purposes. Keep the open case and the compromise discussion distinct.
Part 35 allows a party to make a written settlement proposal during court proceedings in the prescribed form. The proposal is made without prejudice while reserving the right to disclose its terms after judgment for decisions on costs and interest. It may cover all or part of the proceedings or a particular issue.
A Part 35 proposal may be made at any time, but not later than 21 days before trial begins. For the specified consequences to apply, it must remain open for acceptance for at least 21 days. The timing should allow the recipient to evaluate the evidence and should not be treated as a last-minute formality.
The fact, amount and supporting payment of a Part 35 proposal are not communicated to the court until liability and the amount awarded have been decided, apart from costs and interest. Accepted proposals and a pleaded pre-action tender defence are treated differently under the Rules.
Acceptance requires written notice to the proposer and delivery of a copy to other parties. A proposal may be withdrawn before acceptance through written notice. Once a proposal concerning the whole claim is accepted, the proceedings are stayed on its terms, subject to approval where the court must approve the settlement.
Calculate the realistic best, expected and adverse outcomes rather than negotiating only from the amount demanded. Review liability, causation, available remedies, evidential gaps, interest, mitigation, counterclaims, expert evidence and the probability of recovering from the opposing party.
Then add the commercial variables. These include legal costs, management time, delay, confidentiality, business disruption, relationship value, reputational exposure and enforcement risk. A discount may be rational when it buys prompt secured payment. The same discount may be irrational when payment is deferred without protection.
Identify the dispute, contract, proceedings, parties and claims. If only one issue or claim is resolved, say so and preserve the remainder expressly. Under Part 35, an offer that does not clearly say otherwise is treated as relating to the whole claim. A partial proposal must identify the part covered and what is proposed for it.
Where there is a counterclaim, the proposal should state whether it takes the counterclaim into account. Where an interim payment has already been made, state whether the proposed amount is additional to that payment or whether the earlier amount will be deducted.
For a Part 35 proposal concerning money or damages, state whether the amount includes interest and costs. If it includes either, specify the amount allocated to each. In an ordinary settlement, the same discipline avoids arguments over whether legal costs, contractual interest, court fees or expert expenses remain payable.
Tax treatment should not be assumed. Compensation, interest, employment payments, property adjustments, share transfers and payments for services or rights can have different consequences. The agreement can allocate responsibility for advice and reporting, but it cannot override tax law or bind a tax authority that is not a party.
State the currency, amount, bank account, payer, due date and whether time is essential. For non-monetary performance, identify the document, asset, information, resignation, transfer, consent or corrective action required. Attach agreed forms where possible rather than leaving them for later negotiation.
If payment depends on another step, define the sequence. For example, releases may take effect only after cleared funds, while documents may be held in escrow pending simultaneous completion. Avoid a structure in which one side permanently surrenders its rights before receiving the promised consideration.
An instalment schedule should state each date and amount, interest, grace period, method of notice and the effect of default. Consider acceleration of the remaining balance, loss of any settlement discount and credit for sums already paid.
Where credit risk matters, assess a guarantee, escrow, charge, retention of title, share pledge or other lawful security appropriate to the assets and parties. Security is useful only if properly created, documented, perfected where required and enforceable against the person or asset intended.
A release should identify the parties and claims covered, the effective date and whether it extends to affiliates, officers, employees, agents, insurers or successors. A broad release may close unknown claims that were never valued. A narrow release may leave satellite disputes alive.
Carve out obligations created by the settlement itself, rights needed to enforce it, liabilities that cannot lawfully be excluded and any unrelated matters the client intends to preserve. A no-admission clause can record that compromise does not amount to acceptance of liability, but it does not alter admissions intentionally made elsewhere.
Confidentiality should define what is protected, who may receive it and how long the obligation lasts. Usual permitted disclosures can include legal and tax advisers, auditors, insurers, banks, regulators, courts, law-enforcement authorities and disclosures required by law. A party may also need to disclose enough information to enforce the agreement.
Non-disparagement clauses should be precise and balanced. They should not prevent truthful evidence, protected reporting, regulatory cooperation or compliance with legal duties. If public statements are important, agree the exact wording or a neutral response in advance.
Where personal data, confidential information, source code, customer records or corporate documents are involved, state what will be returned, retained or destroyed and when. Preserve copies required by professional, statutory, regulatory, insurance, accounting or litigation-hold duties.
Confirm that each signatory can bind the relevant individual or entity. Companies may require board approval, shareholder approval or compliance with reserved matters. If performance depends on a bank, insurer, co-owner, trustee, guarantor or regulator, obtain the required consent rather than promising an outcome outside the party’s control.
A settlement should explain what constitutes default, whether notice is required, the available cure period and the consequences. These may include acceleration, contractual interest, recovery of enforcement costs, revival of stayed proceedings or an application to enforce agreed terms.
Under Part 35, if an accepted proposal is not performed, a party may apply for orders lifting the stay, enforcing the settlement terms or granting another appropriate remedy. A damages claim arising from breach of an accepted proposal can generally be made by application in the existing proceedings unless the court directs otherwise.
If proceedings already exist, specify whether they will be stayed, withdrawn, dismissed or resolved by consent and who will take the procedural step. Withdrawal or dismissal can have different consequences. Do not file a final disposal step before the agreed payment or performance protection is in place unless the bargain intentionally requires it.
For a mediation settlement within the applicable statutory framework, the Civil Procedure Rules contain a route for a court order making the agreement enforceable where the required consent and conditions are satisfied. The settlement should address whether the parties consent to such an application and who bears its cost.
This briefing reflects Cyprus legislation and procedural rules reviewed on 20 July 2026. Settlement consequences depend on the wording, timing, dispute, parties, applicable procedure and court orders.
This article provides general information on settlement proposals in Cyprus as at 20 July 2026. It is not legal, tax or financial advice and does not determine whether any communication is open, without prejudice, privileged, compliant with Part 35 or enforceable. The outcome depends on the exact wording, evidence, authority, consideration, timing, procedure, applicable law and facts. Obtain advice before accepting, rejecting, withdrawing or relying upon a settlement proposal.
Practical answers on without-prejudice offers, Part 35 proposals, acceptance, withdrawal, costs, instalments, releases, confidentiality, mediation and enforcement.
It is an offer to resolve all or part of a dispute through agreed payment, performance, release or other terms. It can be made before proceedings, during litigation or through mediation.
A demand letter normally states the open legal position and remedy required. A settlement proposal explores compromise and may be communicated separately on a without-prejudice or formal Part 35 basis.
Not automatically. The communication should be part of a genuine attempt to settle an existing dispute. The wording, context and recognised exceptions must be considered.
It is a formal written proposal made during Cyprus court proceedings under Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules 2023. A compliant proposal can have defined consequences relating to costs and interest.
For the specified Part 35 consequences to apply, it must remain available for acceptance for at least 21 days. It must also be made no later than 21 days before trial begins.
A Part 35 proposal may be withdrawn before acceptance by serving written notice. The withdrawal and any replacement offer should be documented clearly.
Yes. A Part 35 monetary proposal must state whether it includes interest or costs and identify the amount allocated to each when included. Ordinary settlement agreements should also address them expressly.
The agreement should state the cure period and consequences, which may include acceleration, interest, loss of a discount, enforcement costs or revival of stayed proceedings.
Often, but its scope requires care. It should identify the claims and parties covered while preserving settlement-enforcement rights and any unrelated matters that should survive.
The parties can agree confidentiality, subject to disclosures required by law and properly drafted exceptions for courts, regulators, advisers, insurers, auditors, banks and enforcement.
Yes. They can negotiate at any stage, use Part 35, mediate or agree consent terms. The agreement should specify how the existing proceedings and costs will be treated.
The route depends on whether it is a contract, accepted Part 35 proposal, consent arrangement or qualifying mediation settlement. Clear terms, authority and the correct procedural step are essential.
A confidential review can value the proposal, protect the legal position and convert the commercial understanding into clear payment, release, security, default and enforcement terms.