It refers to a situation where shares are transferred, registered or retained without proper authority, valid consent, lawful basis or equitable entitlement.
Rectification is a Court remedy under section 111 of Cap. 113 where the register of members is corrected because a person was wrongly entered, omitted or not removed.
Yes. In a rectification application, the Court may decide questions relating to title where necessary to determine whether the register should be corrected.
A constructive trust claim argues that a person holding shares or benefits obtained through wrongdoing should be treated in equity as holding them for the rightful beneficiary.
No. Section 112 of Cap. 113 provides that no notice of an express, implied or constructive trust shall be entered on the register or receivable by the Registrar.
No. The trust may not appear on the register, but equitable entitlement and constructive trust arguments may still be relevant before the Court.
Depending on the facts, the company or claimant may seek remedies such as account of profits, restoration of property, constructive trust treatment or other equitable relief.
Important evidence includes transfer forms, registers, certificates, minutes, shareholder agreements, emails, payment records, nominee arrangements and proof of intention.
Yes. Interim relief may be important where disputed shares are being used to vote, alter control, approve transactions or prejudice the company before final judgment.
Yes. If the transfer forms part of wider exclusion, dilution or abuse of control, oppression remedies under section 202 of Cap. 113 may be relevant.
No. A wrongful share transfer claim may involve company law, equity, fiduciary duties, title, register rectification and corporate control issues.
It begins with a confidential review of the register, transfer history, documents, parties, evidence, urgency and desired remedy.